we lost the vote | Redrods
view | you
and your contract | what the new contract means |
we
need an explanation | the consequences of the vote
NSASG, the BMA & Dept of Health | membership | committee | discussion
forum
Disappointingly we lost the vote for the new contract…we recommended
a no vote. There is not much we can do about this. Even if we won the
vote, the Dept of Health (DOH) would still implement the new vote for
new Staff Grade doctors. DK
Here are the numbers... UK wide out of about 25,000 SAS doctors/dentists
the number of Registered voters was 13,296 and total Votes cast is 5,139
(a very poor turnout- calls into question the validity of the Ballot
Results).
The distribution of votes,in England/Wales/N.Ireland Yes vote 2,563 and
NO votes 1,889 In Scotland Yes vote 542 and NO vote 145 (we don't
know the number of votes spoiled/not counted). SH
One member said his "ballot
paper did not arrive until Friday morning last week despite chasing
it up for the previous 4 weeks. Because
it was after 5pm it was too late to vote either by phone or on the net. " LB
AB said "The turn out was comparable to the general election.
There is no point fighting this result.
Everyone should stick to the old contact and see how the new one works
in real life for others
I would recommend no one signs up to anything other than 7 clinical PA's,
1 teaching/ supervision PA, 1 admin PA and 1 for CPD if considering
the new contract - some trusts may go for this and also make sure if
you move jobs you negotiate hard for flexible time PA's - and if the
trust will not negotiate then walk away!!"
AH said "This is very sad that the contract has been accepted. The
new contract from April 2008 means already we have
lost 2 years pay rise, and will be the worst lot of
doctors in the NHS.
It is the saddest day for the SAS doctors."
See below for SH comments.
The contract is now dead and buried our duty is now to make it irrelevant.
We must in our own trusts make certain that management (as they will
try) do not attempt to impose this "arrangement" . We must be outgoing
towards particularly our overseas colleagues who are often bullied and
harassed into very unsavoury working agreements, get hold of those list
servers in your trust.
The contract was accepted by approximately 20% of those using their
vote, we must urge the BMA to publish the numbers taking up this contract
at the deadline date for Assoc.Spec. regrading (April 2009). If the BMA
are not forthcoming with their information, we will demand it from the
NHSE under the freedom of information act, we must publish these figures
widely. Each and everyone of us should write to the BMA news on a regular
basis, some letters must get through! It may be time to start lobbying
the present opposition, we should ask them in respect of their plans
re medical staffing and how they see health service provision five years
hence?
I do not expect us (NSASG) to achieve the level of support to be in
a position to negotiate with employers. We must commence on the long
march through the institutions, we must represent our members in the
LNC. Locally at BMA level and regionally at CSCOM, and nationally at
the SASC (abolished!) or it's successor. We are a strong group with opinions
(I've often put my money where my mouth is!) Lets use our solidarity
because we know better! REDROD
the new contract offers you more money, but longer working sessions,
(4 hours instead of 3.5 hours), later sessions (until 7pm in the evening
if demanded by management). There are some advantages…a
more transparent promoting prospect. However, the requirements for promotion
to the top grapes are quite demanding and every few of us will qualify.
The NSASG recommends you keep the old contract.
In addition to the points above for AS, your top salary will remain £65000,
that is I about £20000 lower than the top for AS. (Although very
few AS are on this salary). Stay with the old contract, and apply for
as many optional pints as possible before the closing date, April 2009.
As far as I can tell, for grades such as Clinical Assistants, the new
contract is probably better than current contracts.
- with the abolition of the AS grade,
the top salary will be £65000, that is about £17,000
less
- for this and other reasons SG will be
hit much harder than AS if the new contract is introduced
- no extra money for working between 5pm-7pm
- 33% extra for outside these hours and
weekends and bank holidays…but these hours of work can be
dictated by Trust
- but on call is paid according to the time spent actually working/on
the phone etc., with an additional very low ~2-6% salary
increase
so
- consider 3 telephone calls in the night, even in the middle
of the night, working about 30 minutes in total, will receive
- £150/session (4 hours/session)= about £40 hour,
- add the 33% overtime = £60/hour
- our case....30 minutes work on the phone = £30
- take tax off = £20 total for the 3 calls
- + £300-1000/year ...that is the 2-6% increase in annual
salary
- the contract gives Trusts a lot of flexibility…good
Trusts will not force doctors to work outside 9-5 hours, bad Trusts
will be able to.
- there are 2 promotion thresholds…the
second is particularly onerous, with 360 degree appraisal,
demonstration of (for example) management capabilities, and so
on. In practice this will prevent many SAS doctors reaching the
top 3 grades.
- The new contract still does not ensure
training; avoiding of deskilling/learning new skills;
re-entry to the training grade (for particularly able/experienced
members). In Birmingham 5+ SAS doctors were stopped operating (cataract
surgery) because they did not have the experience/training to continue.
They were not allowed theatre sessions to address this. Even a
compromise of allowing 3 to take over the sessions of the rest,
and continue their surgery, was blocked by the medical managers
(the consultants wanted to take over the surgery)
- sessions are increased to 4 hours…therefore
less lunch break; 11th ‘free session’ for AS is abandoned;
there is a little extra payment for this (for only ~25% of the
extra work involved)
In the SAS Ballot 17/3/8 there were 8,157 missing Votes.
Only 5,139
voted: 3105 voted for the new contract, the rest against.
The BMA issued 13,296 ballot papers to the registered SAS members.
This is the Non-Negotiated SAS-Contract that was put to vote – after
NHSE walked out of the Negotiations and the proposed contract was dead.
SAS grassroots are shocked and angry and questions are being asked;
- What was the Role of SAS leaders and Negotiators?
- Why the leaders/Negotiators adopted the policy of “silence”??
and dissociated themselves from grassroots.
- Why grassroots were kept in ‘Dark’ during Negotiations??
- How the proposed contract was resurrected after NHSE walked out from
the Negotiating Table?
- What is in it for the SAS leadership for this betrayal and sell out.
- Why Ballot papers were not issued to all the Registered SAS on time.
- Where are the missing 8,157 uncounted/unaccounted votes??
- From 1st April 08 the SAS grades will be closed for
any new entrants.
- Staff Grades, Associate Specialists, hospital Practitioners,
Medical Officers,
Community medical officers, & Senior Medical Officers in Post will
have the option to stay in their Grade or opt for the New Grade but
once you opt for the New –you cannot revert back!
- Some may find the new option financially attractive but please
look at your rota commitments including on-call before any decision.
- Get involved – form local Groups and join nsasg and keep yourself
aware.
NSASG must
- demand the investigation into the over 8,000
missing votes
- Work out the future strategy and improve the NSASG membership.
DK agrees, and will prepare a letter to thew BMA and DOH.
Here
is the BMA reply to our case . Here
is the DOH letter to the NSASG
Any NHS non-training and non-consultant doctor/dentist. Our aims:
- To support members in negotiating with the Department
of Health (DOH).
- In this respect to negotiate better conditions than the new contract
offers
- To achieve a career structure, so that members can achieve competencies
etc, and progress from staff grade to associate specialist for instance.
- The highest achieving members should achieve a post as consultant,
by means of article 14 or its replacement.
- To put pressure on the BMA to ensure that they fully support these
measures and negotiate more effectively with the DOH
- NSAS will not have enough power (at least initially) to replace the
BMA in supporting individual doctors in negotiations with their Trust
- We have~150 members so far. Apparently we have to
have a much greater membership before we can be involved in negotiations…
'Chairman' david.kinshuck at heartofengland.nhs.uk
Secretary: Josephine Woodhouse; publicity...
Rod Price |